|
| |||||||
|
INSIDER INFO -- SEPTEMBER 2003
Gunfight at the Allegheny Corral
Jim Roddey
Dan Onorato
The Republican Race for State Attorney General
Political Updates
|
We
welcome and appreciate any feedback
you may OPT OUT
The views contained in The Insider are those exclusively of its editor, Al Neri, unless an article is specifically authored by another writer. | ||||||
| Insider's Stories | |||||||
|
Gunfight at the Allegheny Corral
The race for Allegheny County executive is already high profile and is likely to break spending records for any Pittsburgh political campaign ever
There is no question that one of the premier races
in the state and even in the nation this November
is the contest to see who will lead Allegheny County
for the next four years.
Polling shows a tight contest in store
with just a few weeks to go until the
Nov. 4 election.
The contest is expected to break
spending records for any election ever
in the Pittsburgh region. Both sides are
likely to spend $2.5 million each
before the last TV spot is aired by the
eve of election. This is a race that will
dominate airwaves and water cooler
chatter in southwestern Pennsylvania
until it’s decided.
When it was created in the late 1990s
after the abolishment of the three county commissioner form
of government, the Allegheny County executive was touted
as the third most powerful executive job in Pennsylvania
government -- surpassed only by the governorship and the
job of mayor of Philadelphia. Voters opted to replace the
three commissioners with a strong executive whose power
would be shared by a 15-member county council, elected by
geographic districts in the 1.3 million-population county.
Jim Roddey, the Republican incumbent and a former business
executive, won a close race four years ago to become
Allegheny’s first chief executive despite a 2-1 Democratic
voter registration edge. Roddey was already a public figure,
well known from his previous service as a board member
and chairman of a number of government-related authorities.
Roddey is now seeking a second term, but the
Democrats, eager to take back the courthouse,
avoided a primary and coalesced around Dan
Onorato, 42, who forfeited an easy re-election
to his current job as county controller for the
chance to snatch away the top job from Roddey.
Asked why he is seeking a second term,
Roddey responds: "Continuing our job growth,
continuing our financial stability and reforming
the row offices are really what I want to
accomplish in the next four years," Roddey
told The Insider. "Then I want to retire and
never think about politics again."
Roddey said he does not think that record of
financial stability will continue or the reforming of the row
offices will be accomplished if the Democrat is elected.
For his part, Onorato said Roddey was elected four years
ago on the promise that he would put his business skills to
work for the county. But Onorato claims Roddey’s first term
has been marked with disappointment.
"Nothing has happened," Onorato said. "Everywhere I go,
people, both Republicans and Democrats, tell me they are
disappointed with him. Nothing has happened that they
thought would happen."
Roddey in his first television advertisement pointed to the
relative fiscal stability of the county versus the city of
Pittsburgh’s flirting with bankruptcy and the budget
problems the Commonwealth is experiencing.
He is also expected to make the city of Pittsburgh’s shaky
finances an issue in the campaign against Onorato because
the Democrat is a former city council member and once
headed up the Finance Committee. "We simply can not let
Dan Onorato do for Allegheny County what he did for the
city of Pittsburgh," Roddey says.
The Insider recently interviewed both candidates. And as
you can see from the transcripts in this issue, the gloves are
already starting to come off in this fight.
Jim Roddey came to Pittsburgh in 1978, believing
it would be just another way stop in his
distinguished career as a businessman and outdoor
advertising executive that included a stint in
Atlanta with Ted Turner and his many media enterprises.
Roddey, who grew up in the South, had never lived in a
northern city before. He had come to Pittsburgh because he
had purchased a billboard company there. But within a few
years, the personable and persistent Southerner had worked
his way into the local civic community and the city’s most
prestigious social circles.
At first, Roddey was a political independent, not registered
with either party, but in 1988 he changed his registration to
Republican to head up Republican Barbara Hafer’s campaign
to be elected auditor general. Ever since, GOP
officials have courted Roddey to run for elective office, but
nothing enticed him into the political arena until the county
executive’s job was created.
He ran for the first time in 1999 and won a narrow general
election victory over a better-known but confrontational
Democrat, Cyril Wecht, the county coroner who is a world
renown forensic pathologist. After his election, Roddey put
his various business interests into a blind trust over which he
has no control.
Roddey, 70, explains the progress he believes he’s brought to
Allegheny County the past four years and what he plans to
do if voters give him a four-year extension on his current
job.
Insider: Tell us a little bit about why you’ve decided to run
for re-election and the accomplishments you see in your
first term.
Roddey: Let me start with the accomplishments. We lowered
the cost of county government over three years by about $89
million. We were able to bring back from Harrisburg $30
million in support that wasn’t there before. We were able to
bring $110 million a year in human services money from the
federal government and about $60 million of public transit
capital projects.
All that allowed us to balance our budget, improve our bond
rating, keep our pension fund fully funded and allowed us to
increase our reserve fund from a low of $9 million when I
took office to triple that, $27 million
earlier this year. So I think fiscal stability
ranks as the most important
thing we accomplished, especially
given recent events in the state budget
and the city (of Pittsburgh) financial
crisis.
Right now, we’ve been able to fund
some critical human service services
where the state had cut funding and
restoration of those funds is part of
the budget stalemate. That’s what the
reserve is for. One of the reasons that I wanted to run is that
we’re still in a difficult time period. It will take a couple of
years more for that (to work out). It’s very important to keep
that discipline and I honestly believe that if I’m not in that
office -- if Dan Onorato is there -- the fiscal stability will be
in danger.
Dan was on city council for eight years and he chaired the
Finance Committee for a number of years. If you go back
and look at his tenure, you’ll see he did nothing at all to put
up any warning signs or make any significant changes. We
simply can not let Dan Onorato do for Allegheny County
what he did for the city of Pittsburgh.
I know Dan Onorato’s campaign is built around two issues --
job creation and property assessments, which I inherited. I
did not walk away from that problem. The budget that I
inherited had a built in $27 million loss.
If I had thrown out those numbers, it would have cost, we
estimate, as much as $25 million. That would have thrown
out any chance for recovery. We finished that first year in the
black, overcoming the $27 million deficit. I made a decision,
it would be tough, but we would go through the appeals
process and fix the system that way. And it worked. We just
got a rating from the tax equalization board that we stand at
97.5 percent -- the highest county in the state. It still has
problems. It still needs to be fixed but we are infinitely
better than we were four years ago. Our plan of concentrating
on companies that are here, trying to improve their
growth, is working.
The final reason for running is that I don’t think we’ll have
real row office reform unless I’m re-elected. Dan keeps talking
about it and says he’s for it but he had an opportunity
this year. We could have amended the administrative code.
We could have had it on the ballot this November. But Dan
did not want that turnout in the suburbs this November and
he’s hiding behind a court ruling. The court would have
allowed us to do it if we amended the administrative code.
He let council members know that he didn’t want that passed
because he didn’t want that turnout in the suburbs.
So continuing our job growth, continuing our financial
stability and reforming the row offices is really what I would
like to accomplish in the next four years. Then I want to
retire and NEVER think about politics again!
Insider: Do you think you can do all that with the county
council majority being Democratic?
Roddey: I believe there is a very good chance I will have a
Republican majority on county council after the November
election. There are two excellent opportunities and if that
happens we can really streamline government and accomplish
a great deal more. There are things we should look at
about privatizing some parts of government and taking an
objective look at that. I don’t think that will happen under a
Democratic executive and a Democratic council. As much as
unions will object to that, it’s better than the alternative in
the city of Pittsburgh where they are virtually bankrupt.
Insider: Regarding U.S. Airways and the threat to abandon
Pittsburgh as a hub airport unless it gets severe lease
reductions, what can you tell us about that?
Roddey: It’s not possible to know what’s going to happen
because U.S. Airways has not been very forthcoming with
information in their negotiations. We believe they will keep a
presence in Pittsburgh. We are hopeful they will keep a hub
operation here. And if they do, it will be made up of fewer
mainline jets and more of the smaller regional jets. We may
still have 400 flights a day but the mix will probably be 3-1
regional jets versus mainline jets. And the jobs will not pay
as well, only about half of what the wages are for the
mainline jets. But I’m not absolutely convinced the U.S.
Airways model will work. They may not be successful and
they may go back into bankruptcy and may not emerge this
time. So it’s important that we bring in other airlines and
we’re working on that and starting to get some real interest
from those airlines.
Insider: Tell us about the campaign team that you’ve put
together for this race.
Roddey: It’s essentially the same team as we had in 1999.
The campaign manager is Kent Gates. Tripp Oliver (on leave
from county staff) is doing research. Brabender Cox is the
ad agency and media strategist and the Tarrence Group is
doing the polling and there’s a whole group of people who
advise and work on various aspects.
We’re doing extremely well in the African-American
community, far better than a Republican should. Most of that
is because my record there has been very positive and Dan’s
has not. Dan voted against creating another minority district
for city council. He voted against the police review board
and reform. All of those things have come back home and
have caused him not to have the support in the black
community that he would have hoped for. We’re doing very
well with seniors and that’s good because they vote in large
numbers.
We’ve had some recent polling numbers. We know Dan has
done some polling and we suspect he knows that this is a
close race. But look, I’m the underdog because there is a
two and half to one registration disadvantage Democrat to
Republican. Dan Onorato is an unknown. He doesn’t have
the experience and that is something we will emphasize in
our campaign. He has high name recognition but the public
doesn’t know anything about him. I have the disadvantage
because I have a record he can criticize. But I think the
record is good and if people are objective and look at it in
light of the fiscal crisis at the city and state level they will
really appreciate the fact that the county has been cautious
and conservative and we’re in good shape.
Insider: When do you think the air part of this campaign
will get under way?
Roddey: Everyone wants to wait until the other guy does it
but my guess is that by late August you’ll see commercials
up. I’ve been going door to door, primarily on the weekends
in Democratic areas. And it’s going to be a tight, close race.
The last time when I ran against Cyril Wecht (Allegheny County
coroner and well-known forensic expert), he was a very good
candidate in many respects. But he tended to polarize people
with folks liking him a lot or not at all. With Dan, he’s an
unknown. People may know the name but if he walked down the
street people would not be able to pick him out.
One of the jobs we’ll have in this campaign is to help Dan
define himself to the public (with a chuckle).
Insider: What are the challenges in the next four years for
the county executive?
Roddey: They will remain the same. No 1 is economic development.
We’ve done well. By the end of the year, we should be at
20,000 new jobs created. But we have to do better, at least 50
percent greater than what we have done. Secondly, fixing everything
with the (property tax) assessments. We need to get all the
bugs out and have a system that people don’t complain about.
Third, we have to keep our eye on the ball with fiscal stability
that we don’t overspend, that we continue to try to make government
less costly and more efficient. Finally, we have challenges
in specific areas: the jail which is full and we need to drive that
population down; there is the U.S. Airways challenge and then
we have the row office reform effort, which will produce significant
savings and improve efficiency.
Dan Onorato The Insider talks with the Democrat challenger.
An accountant and a lawyer by training, Dan
Onorato, a native of Pittsburgh’s North Side,
ran for his first elective office in 1991 when he
was just barely 30 years old. He had just gotten a law degree
from Pitt two years earlier after spending a number of years
as an auditor with an accounting firm after graduating from
Penn State in 1983.
In 1999, Onorato gave up his council seat to run for his
present office, Allegheny County controller, where he is the
chief fiscal watchdog of county government. Onorato said
that during his three years in that office he led programs and
initiatives that have helped county government operate more
efficiently and that have saved the taxpayers millions of
dollars.
He is also a board member of the National Aviary and is a
former board member of the Pittsburgh Children’s Museum
as well as secretary of the Allegheny County Retirement
Board, a post he holds by virtue of being county controller.
Onorato still lives in Pittsburgh’s North Side with his wife,
Shelly, and their three children: Kate, Emily and Danny.
Insider: Tell us a little about your career so far.
Onorato: I was born and raised in the North Side of
Pittsburgh where I still live. I went to Penn State where I
obtained an accounting degree and then I spent a few years
practicing before I went to Pitt for my law degree. I was a
lawyer for a few years and then I decided to seek the city
council seat for the North Side and I challenged an incumbent,
running against the endorsement and the machine. So it
was a political upset. I spent two terms, eight years on city
council. And I decided not to seek a third term but to run for
county controller instead in 1999. And now I’m at that
critical crossroads again where I’ve decided not to seek
re-election so it’s up or out this November. I’m not doing it
because I’m trying to hold on to a political office. I’m trying
to move this county forward.
Insider: What are the one or two accomplishments as
controller that you are most proud of?
Onorato: First of the computer system, which had not been
upgraded in any major way for 22 years. We took 10
systems and merged them into one, which will be very
helpful in streamlining government.
Secondly, the audits that we’ve done
have saved the county millions of
dollars. Plus, I’ve audited every
single row officer, all of them fellow
Democrats; because I wanted to show
that I was definitely non-partisan.
Insider: What do you view as the
challenges for the next four years
for the Allegheny County executive?
Onorato: The issues are very straight-forward.
No 1, we still have a property tax system that is
broken. We have to fix that. We have to cut government, to
be able to cut property taxes. And the third thing is economic
development. So fixing the property tax system and growing
the economy at the same time. The way to do that is to
grow the economy and spread the tax base to allow for a
reduction. We have 10,000 acres ready for development at
the new airport. We should invest in the infrastructure to
allow that development to happen. And we can do that
through the right kind of public-private partnerships.
Insider: Tell us a little bit about the political team that
you’ve put together for this race.
Onorato: On my local team I have Joe Viebeck who has been
with me for all of my races. I find him to be the best grass-roots,
street-knowledgeable person in politics in Pittsburgh
and Allegheny County. I have a gentleman who is in charge
of my field operations by the name of Marty Marks. Marty
came back to Pittsburgh about a year ago with his wife who
works for the Carnegie Science Center doing public
relations. He has experience running the field operation for
Mayor Richard Daley of Chicago and U.S. Sen. Richard
Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois.
For my media, I decided to get Neil Oxman of Philadelphia
for two reasons. First, Neil has a great relationship with the
governor and the governor is supporting me 100 percent and
secondly, Neil has already gone against the team that
Roddey hired. He has experience dealing with Kent Gates,
the campaign manager, and Brabender Cox, Jim’s media
guy, because they were the consultants for the Mike Fisher
campaign when Neil did Ed Rendell for governor. And we
also brought on Dan Fee who successfully did the
communications for the Rendell campaign and will
coordinate the day-to-day media in this campaign. And
Dan Petz is handling the polling. If you combine Neil and
the two Dans with the local team I think we have a very
strong campaign organization.
Insider: I presume the polling you’ve done this far is
encouraging to you?
Onorato: Yes: The polling is very optimistic and it’s one of
the factors that’s enabled me to match Jim Roddey dollar for
dollar in fund-raising.
Insider: What is the status of your campaign finances?
Onorato: I’ve raised approximately $1.6 million going into
August and Jim about $1.7 million. We both have about $1.3
million in the bank for this race so far. My budget, my goal
has always been $2.5 million and that is still my budget and
we will definitely hit that. Jim probably has the same budget.
This race is not going to be won or lost on who has more
money.
Insider: You mentioned your relationship with Gov. Rendell
but you also have a relationship with John Estey his chief
of staff.
Onorato: Yes, we went to law school together. He even visited
Pittsburgh and worked on my very first campaign for
council. He was part of my kitchen cabinet. We were all very
young then, 29, 30 years old.
Insider: One of Jim Roddey’s points is that he is a "full
time" executive and that you’ve always had some outside
employment while you’ve held office in city council or as
controller. Explain that to us?
Onorato: More misinformation on his part. I’ve been "of
counsel" to some law firm ever since I was elected to
council. I will tell you that it’s not much. In 2002, I made
$14,000 maybe, from doing things for people in my
neighborhood at nights and on Saturdays. I am definetly a
full-time controller and public servant.
If Jim wants to make that an issue, I will challenge him.
I will show him what "of counsel" means and produce the
activity that took place that earned $14,000 while I was
controller and I would hope that he would open up the
records to the blind trust in which he put his business
interests when he became executive. In 1999, when he was
running for county executive, he made $900,000 in the
private sector, according to his tax returns. I’ll compare my
$14,000 to his $900,000 any day of the week!
Insider: He also has been trying to tag you with the city of
Pittsburgh’s financial problems.
Onorato: First of all, I’ve been off council for four years.
I was finance chair in 1994 and 1995, nine years ago. We
had balanced budgets. We privatized the zoo, the aviary and
Phipps Conservatory. I also sponsored and had passed a cut
in the city business privilege taxes. I sponsored the senior
citizens’ tax rebate. I’ve been a very strong fiscal
conservative.
What Jim doesn’t want to tell you is that he’s the one with a
much longer history of involvement with city government.
He has been part of the last three administrations in the
county and the city over the past 20 years. He was appointed
chairman of a water and sewer authority where he consistently
raised rates. He was then appointed by the county
commissioners to be chairman of the (Pittsburgh region mass
transit agency) Port Authority where he consistently raised
fares. He was chairman of Alcosan (the Allegheny County
Sanitary Authority or sewage system) where he consistently
raised rates. And now he is the head of county government
where he’s imposed a $32 million tax increase. Anyone can
balance budgets if you raise rates or taxes and that is his
track record. He was part of all those administrations.
Insider: What would be your biggest criticism of the
Roddey administration?
Onorato: There are two things and they are equally troubling.
Jim Roddey embraced the property reassessment in
Allegheny County and it ended up being a $32 million windfall.
He did not take seriously cutting government and that
has really hurt. Jim triggered a tax increase for the school
districts, for the municipalities and the county because they
are all based on these numbers. And as a result, according to
an article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, we have had the
largest number of foreclosures in Allegheny County since
1969, even worse than the collapse of the steel industry in
the early 1980s. He’s taxing people out of their homes! I’m
making that connection.
He was elected four years ago and told the people, "I’m a
businessman. I’ll use my contacts to grow this region." But
instead it’s been four years of missed opportunities. I can’t
point to one economic development that he started or
finished or completed in the last four years. Nothing has
happened. Everywhere I go people, both Republicans and
Democrats, tell me they are disappointed with him. Nothing
has happened that they thought would happen.
The Republican Race for State Attorney General Three qualified and aggressive candidates are looking to succeed the incumbent Mike Fisher, who is term-limited in the job
It’s a battle that is being fought below the surface
for the moment. It takes the form of letters,
newsletters and personal visits to local Republican
officials and Republican State Committee members. It’s fund
raising and building coalitions -- and looking over your
shoulder at two equally aggressive rivals.
Welcome to the race for the Republican nomination for
attorney general, which may just be coming into view for the
casual observer of state politics but which has for those
involved already has become intense if static for the
moment.
Static because it’s unlikely that any of the three GOP hopefuls
will pull out before Republican State Committee meets
in January and selects its endorsed candidate for next April’s
primary. Pennsylvanians have only elected three attorney
generals since the office was made elective in 1980 and all
have been Republicans, making the action on the GOP side
of the fence quite intense for the job of chief law enforcement
officer.
In fact, some Republican observers say the political activity
swirling around the 2004 race for attorney general is the
most competitive they have seen in the party since 1994
when there was an open governor’s seat and five
Republicans competed. That year Tom Ridge, an Erie
congressman, won the coveted party endorsement, narrowly
won a five-way primary for governor and then went on to
win in November.
What remains unclear right now is what will happen after
January when presumably the state party endorses one of the
The Republican race for state attorney general is intense with three qualified and aggressive candidates looking to succeed the incumbent Mike Fisher, who is term-limited in the job
three hopefuls. Will the other two contenders drop out, as
has been the custom in the party? The issue remains to be
settled.
The three hopefuls come from three corners of the state --
Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Scranton (with a secondary base
in Harrisburg). So it is a Bermuda Triangle of a competition.
Here are the contenders in alphabetical order:
All three men believe they have a strong stake on the job.
Each has a campaign apparatus in place. Each believes they
can win the party endorsement and keep the office in
Republican hands.
That may be no easy task because a slew of Democrats has
their sights set on that job as well. As this issue was going to
press, Allegheny County District Attorney Steve Zappala,
who had previously said he was exclusively focused on re-election,
said he is now considering seeking the Democratic
nomination after being approached about the job by Gov. Ed
Rendell at a recent political event in Pittsburgh.
Other candidates considering a run include Jim Eisenhower,
the party’s 2000 nominee for that job, a close Rendell supporter
and chairman of the Pennsylvania Commission on
Crime and Delinquency; former U.S. Attorney David
Barasch of Harrisburg and two local district attorneys, John
Morganelli of Northampton County and Matt Mangino of
Lawrence County.
But for now the three Republican contenders are focused on
getting the edge on each other.
Corbett proclaims that he had the job for 15 months by
gubernatorial appointment so he has "a head start" and can
hit the ground running. He also chaired the commission on
crime and delinquency for Govs. Ridge and Schweiker for
eight years. After leaving Harrisburg in 1997, he returned to
a large Pittsburgh law firm, then became general counsel for
a waste management company. He now practices some law
while spending most of his days campaigning.
Peters, who began his career as a street cop in his hometown
of Scranton, said he has drawn on that experience in his
dealings with people throughout his career in law enforcement.
"I’ve always worked in law enforcement and I want to
continue that regardless of my candidacy," said Peters, who
is also a consultant on law enforcement issues while he runs
for attorney general.
Castor is best known in his home region as a flamboyant
homicide prosecutor who has personally handled a number
of headline cases. He began his career as an intern in the
Montgomery County district attorney’s office in 1985 and
rose to first assistant in 1993. He was elected DA in 1999
and is up for re-election on the November ballot.
Castor sees his local notoriety and his electoral experience
as his advantages on his two foes. "I know positions that
they (Corbett and Peters) have held but I don’t know exactly
what they did there. With me, all you have to do is type my
name into (an Internet) search engine and 3,000 newspaper
articles show up with things I did," Castor said.
The Insider has interviewed all three Republican hopefuls
and plans to run the full text of the interviews in our first
issue in October.
Political Updates National Democrats see Pennsylvania as not their best target for Congress
Sources at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee list their top priorities in Pennsylvania in this order:
But Pennsylvania Democrats know they will have a tough time getting the national House Democratic Campaign Committee to fund races here.
It’s all a numbers game to the DCCC. As long as Pennsylvania keeps losing seats in
Congress due to just modest population gain compared to other states, it makes little sense for national Democrats to fight for seats here that might be gobbled up in the next redistricting -- especially when redistricting is controlled by Pennsylvania’s GOP-dominated state Legislature.
That makes winning a seat in Pennsylvania a lower priority than winning one in states with population gains like Texas, Arizona and California.
"If you win a seat in Pennsylvania, you can lose it 8 years later to
reapportionment," one top DCCC strategist said. "If you win a seat in a
state with population growth, you can only lose it at an election. And
that’s a better state to invest our resources in."
Democrat Max Baer talks about "constituent service" from the court system in his bid for a seat on the state Supreme Court
Pundits are impressed with Judge Max Baer's new "constituent service"
campaign, but wonder if even that tried-and-trued voter-pleaser will work in
a judicial election.
About 50 years ago, with the move to increase federal congressional staffs,
congressmen began to get elected not because of how they voted, but because
they helped their voters deal with the ever more complicated bureaucracy of the federal government.
Nowadays, modern members of Congress have between four and 10 staff members whose sole job is to help voters with their problems with Social Security, Medicare, immigration, passports and other matters.
Other levels of government, including city councils and state assemblies
have also increased staffs and offer "constituent services" in district
offices. Most political analysts believe the growing emphasis on constituent services along with the sheer expense of running for elective office are the prime reasons incumbents rarely lose re-election.
So now Baer, who won accolades for his work in reforming Allegheny County’s Family Court division during the 1990s, is trying to apply this principle to his Supreme Court race against fellow jurist, Republican Joan Orie Melvin who now sits on the Superior Court.
While most people deal with the federal and local governments on a regular basis (getting a passport, resolving their parent's Social Security hassles, putting their parents into a nursing home, etc.) few deal with the court system.
And even fewer know that when it comes to making the rules for courts and lawyers, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court earns that word, "Supreme." Unlike the federal courts, state Supreme Court regulations trump those of the Legislature. The only way for the Legislature to override a court decision is the cumbersome process of amending the state constitution.
Baer wants to use those broad powers of the high court to make it more "user friendly." Baer is promising to push for more night and weekend sessions for family court and other courts which compel the attendance of those who must work for a living and for whom taking off time to attend court sessions is a hardship.
Baer is also promising to work to make the court system pay for DNA testing in any applicable case.
Those are promises that most people would welcome, because they would make
the court more citizen-friendly. But they are expensive and would not only
require more state money, but conceivably could dump unfunded mandates on
the counties.
Melvin, who is more cautious in that regard, is promising only to think about
Baer's proposals. Publicly, she only favors court-paid DNA testing in death
penalty murder cases.
But privately, she is telling supporters she would use the court's rule-making powers to enact tort reforms, lawsuit limits and perhaps to pay attorney contingency fees.
The practical effect of this is that if Baer is elected, he will try to let it be seen as not only a mandate for his specific proposals but, in general, for the more sweeping use of the high court’s judicial rule-making power.
Bob Asher proves his prowess as a fund-raiser again
Republican National Committeeman Bob Asher showed again this past month why he is
one of the state's premier fund-raisers. On Sept. 25, his Pennsylvania Future Fund raised $120,000 for Supreme Court GOP nominee Joan Orie Melvin, $135,000 for Sam Katz, the Republican candidate for mayor of Philadelphia and $25,000 each for the state House and state Senate GOP campaign committees.
That is $300,000 in one night, a feat matched only by the likes of Ed Rendell, Tom Ridge and Arlen Specter, fund raising champions all.
Those funds for Katz come after Asher had already played a key role in successful fund-raisers for President Bush which met the president's Pennsylvania goals.
And in the case of Katz, it shows just how deep the Republican Party runs
in Asher's veins. Katz, as many will remember, ran against Tom Ridge in the
1994 primary for governor. One of Katz’s ads specifically pilloried Ridge
for having the support of Asher, who served about a year in prison after this conviction in the 1980s in the complicated CTA bribery scandal. The CTA case also took down state Treasurer R. Budd Dwyer who publicly committed suicide rather than accept his fate of a jail term.
But as little as five years after that slight from the Katz campaign, Asher was raising money for Katz in his 1999 unsuccessful bid for mayor when he narrowly lost to Democrat John Street. And Asher has remained a major fund-raiser for Katz all along.
Pennsylvania Women’s Coalition Fund honors one of its own while raising funds toward its goal of electing more women to the Legislature.
On Sept. 23, the Pennsylvania Women’s Coalition Fund honored Nancy Newman, its former president and one of the founders of the bipartisan fund which supports progressive women candidates running for the state Legislature, regardless of party affiliation.
The event in Harrisburg raised more than $10,000. Newman of Lewisburg is the author of a number of books about women and politics and is a former national president of the League of Women’s Voters and she also chaired the national campaign to pass the Equal Rights Amendment. Newman was presented with the Seneca award named for Seneca Falls, NY, the location of the first women’s rights convention in the United States.
National group targets Specter as a RINO (Republican in Name Only)
The Arlen Specter-Pat Toomey primary earned a half-page article in the Time Magazine late this month. The contest was highlighted as one of the intra-party races in which the conservative Club for Growth will invest toward its long-term goal of defeating a major RINO and Specter definitely is in the group’s sight hairs. The club has sent Toomey $350,000 toward what it hopes to be a $1 million package to help him unseat Specter. The moderate-leaning Republican Main Street Partnership intends to raise $1 million for Specter to neutralize the Club for Growth’s efforts for Toomey.
Bruce Castor files $400,000 campaign cash balance for late September
Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor is up for re-election but really has his eye on next year’s prize of the Republican nomination for state attorney general. Castor cites fund-raising as one of his strengths in the intra-party contest with former appointed state attorney general Tom Corbett and former state and federal prosecutor Joe Peters. Castor’s campaign reported late last month that he had $400,000 cash on hand. It’s unlikely Castor will spend any of that on his easy re-election, instead hoarding it for the battle for the state GOP endorsement in January or the primary in April.
| |||||||