Go back to The Insider Archive

INSIDER INFO -- SEPTEMBER 2003

Gunfight at the Allegheny Corral
The race for Allegheny County executive is already high profile and is likely to break spending records for any Pittsburgh political campaign ever.

Jim Roddey
The Insider talks with the Republican incumbent county executive.

Dan Onorato
The Insider talks with the Democrat challenger.

The Republican Race for State Attorney General
Three qualified and aggressive candidates are looking to succeed the incumbent Mike Fisher, who is term-limited in the job.

Political Updates
National Democrats see Pennsylvania as not their best target for Congress.






Editor: 
Al Neri

We welcome and appreciate any feedback you may 
have concerning

The Insider

OPT OUT
To unsubscribe, 
please send an
e-mail to
The Insider 

The views contained in The Insider are those exclusively of its editor, Al Neri, unless an article is specifically authored by another writer.

Insider's Stories
Gunfight at the Allegheny Corral
The race for Allegheny County executive is already high profile and is likely to break spending records for any Pittsburgh political campaign ever

There is no question that one of the premier races in the state and even in the nation this November is the contest to see who will lead Allegheny County for the next four years.

Polling shows a tight contest in store with just a few weeks to go until the Nov. 4 election.

The contest is expected to break spending records for any election ever in the Pittsburgh region. Both sides are likely to spend $2.5 million each before the last TV spot is aired by the eve of election. This is a race that will dominate airwaves and water cooler chatter in southwestern Pennsylvania until it’s decided.

When it was created in the late 1990s after the abolishment of the three county commissioner form of government, the Allegheny County executive was touted as the third most powerful executive job in Pennsylvania government -- surpassed only by the governorship and the job of mayor of Philadelphia. Voters opted to replace the three commissioners with a strong executive whose power would be shared by a 15-member county council, elected by geographic districts in the 1.3 million-population county.

Jim Roddey, the Republican incumbent and a former business executive, won a close race four years ago to become Allegheny’s first chief executive despite a 2-1 Democratic voter registration edge. Roddey was already a public figure, well known from his previous service as a board member and chairman of a number of government-related authorities.

Roddey is now seeking a second term, but the Democrats, eager to take back the courthouse, avoided a primary and coalesced around Dan Onorato, 42, who forfeited an easy re-election to his current job as county controller for the chance to snatch away the top job from Roddey.

Asked why he is seeking a second term, Roddey responds: "Continuing our job growth, continuing our financial stability and reforming the row offices are really what I want to accomplish in the next four years," Roddey told The Insider. "Then I want to retire and never think about politics again."

Roddey said he does not think that record of financial stability will continue or the reforming of the row offices will be accomplished if the Democrat is elected.

For his part, Onorato said Roddey was elected four years ago on the promise that he would put his business skills to work for the county. But Onorato claims Roddey’s first term has been marked with disappointment.

"Nothing has happened," Onorato said. "Everywhere I go, people, both Republicans and Democrats, tell me they are disappointed with him. Nothing has happened that they thought would happen."

Roddey in his first television advertisement pointed to the relative fiscal stability of the county versus the city of Pittsburgh’s flirting with bankruptcy and the budget problems the Commonwealth is experiencing.

He is also expected to make the city of Pittsburgh’s shaky finances an issue in the campaign against Onorato because the Democrat is a former city council member and once headed up the Finance Committee. "We simply can not let Dan Onorato do for Allegheny County what he did for the city of Pittsburgh," Roddey says.

The Insider recently interviewed both candidates. And as you can see from the transcripts in this issue, the gloves are already starting to come off in this fight.


Go back to Insider Info


Jim Roddey
The Insider talks with the Republican incumbent county executive.

Jim Roddey came to Pittsburgh in 1978, believing it would be just another way stop in his distinguished career as a businessman and outdoor advertising executive that included a stint in Atlanta with Ted Turner and his many media enterprises. Roddey, who grew up in the South, had never lived in a northern city before. He had come to Pittsburgh because he had purchased a billboard company there. But within a few years, the personable and persistent Southerner had worked his way into the local civic community and the city’s most prestigious social circles.

He became a friend and confidant of mayors and county officials and he held a number of top appointed posts in local government, including the Pittsburgh Clean Cities Committee, The Pittsburgh Water Authority and the Allegheny County Sanitary Authority (sewage system) and the Port Authority of Allegheny County, the transit system.

At first, Roddey was a political independent, not registered with either party, but in 1988 he changed his registration to Republican to head up Republican Barbara Hafer’s campaign to be elected auditor general. Ever since, GOP officials have courted Roddey to run for elective office, but nothing enticed him into the political arena until the county executive’s job was created.

  Jim Roddey

He ran for the first time in 1999 and won a narrow general election victory over a better-known but confrontational Democrat, Cyril Wecht, the county coroner who is a world renown forensic pathologist. After his election, Roddey put his various business interests into a blind trust over which he has no control.

Roddey, 70, explains the progress he believes he’s brought to Allegheny County the past four years and what he plans to do if voters give him a four-year extension on his current job.

Insider: Tell us a little bit about why you’ve decided to run for re-election and the accomplishments you see in your first term.

Roddey: Let me start with the accomplishments. We lowered the cost of county government over three years by about $89 million. We were able to bring back from Harrisburg $30 million in support that wasn’t there before. We were able to bring $110 million a year in human services money from the federal government and about $60 million of public transit capital projects.

All that allowed us to balance our budget, improve our bond rating, keep our pension fund fully funded and allowed us to increase our reserve fund from a low of $9 million when I took office to triple that, $27 million earlier this year. So I think fiscal stability ranks as the most important thing we accomplished, especially given recent events in the state budget and the city (of Pittsburgh) financial crisis.

Right now, we’ve been able to fund some critical human service services where the state had cut funding and restoration of those funds is part of the budget stalemate. That’s what the reserve is for. One of the reasons that I wanted to run is that we’re still in a difficult time period. It will take a couple of years more for that (to work out). It’s very important to keep that discipline and I honestly believe that if I’m not in that office -- if Dan Onorato is there -- the fiscal stability will be in danger.

Dan was on city council for eight years and he chaired the Finance Committee for a number of years. If you go back and look at his tenure, you’ll see he did nothing at all to put up any warning signs or make any significant changes. We simply can not let Dan Onorato do for Allegheny County what he did for the city of Pittsburgh.

I know Dan Onorato’s campaign is built around two issues -- job creation and property assessments, which I inherited. I did not walk away from that problem. The budget that I inherited had a built in $27 million loss.

If I had thrown out those numbers, it would have cost, we estimate, as much as $25 million. That would have thrown out any chance for recovery. We finished that first year in the black, overcoming the $27 million deficit. I made a decision, it would be tough, but we would go through the appeals process and fix the system that way. And it worked. We just got a rating from the tax equalization board that we stand at 97.5 percent -- the highest county in the state. It still has problems. It still needs to be fixed but we are infinitely better than we were four years ago. Our plan of concentrating on companies that are here, trying to improve their growth, is working.

The final reason for running is that I don’t think we’ll have real row office reform unless I’m re-elected. Dan keeps talking about it and says he’s for it but he had an opportunity this year. We could have amended the administrative code. We could have had it on the ballot this November. But Dan did not want that turnout in the suburbs this November and he’s hiding behind a court ruling. The court would have allowed us to do it if we amended the administrative code.

He let council members know that he didn’t want that passed because he didn’t want that turnout in the suburbs.

So continuing our job growth, continuing our financial stability and reforming the row offices is really what I would like to accomplish in the next four years. Then I want to retire and NEVER think about politics again!

Insider: Do you think you can do all that with the county council majority being Democratic?

Roddey: I believe there is a very good chance I will have a Republican majority on county council after the November election. There are two excellent opportunities and if that happens we can really streamline government and accomplish a great deal more. There are things we should look at about privatizing some parts of government and taking an objective look at that. I don’t think that will happen under a Democratic executive and a Democratic council. As much as unions will object to that, it’s better than the alternative in the city of Pittsburgh where they are virtually bankrupt.

Insider: Regarding U.S. Airways and the threat to abandon Pittsburgh as a hub airport unless it gets severe lease reductions, what can you tell us about that?

Roddey: It’s not possible to know what’s going to happen because U.S. Airways has not been very forthcoming with information in their negotiations. We believe they will keep a presence in Pittsburgh. We are hopeful they will keep a hub operation here. And if they do, it will be made up of fewer mainline jets and more of the smaller regional jets. We may still have 400 flights a day but the mix will probably be 3-1 regional jets versus mainline jets. And the jobs will not pay as well, only about half of what the wages are for the mainline jets. But I’m not absolutely convinced the U.S. Airways model will work. They may not be successful and they may go back into bankruptcy and may not emerge this time. So it’s important that we bring in other airlines and we’re working on that and starting to get some real interest from those airlines.

Insider: Tell us about the campaign team that you’ve put together for this race.

Roddey: It’s essentially the same team as we had in 1999. The campaign manager is Kent Gates. Tripp Oliver (on leave from county staff) is doing research. Brabender Cox is the ad agency and media strategist and the Tarrence Group is doing the polling and there’s a whole group of people who advise and work on various aspects.

We’re doing extremely well in the African-American community, far better than a Republican should. Most of that is because my record there has been very positive and Dan’s has not. Dan voted against creating another minority district for city council. He voted against the police review board and reform. All of those things have come back home and have caused him not to have the support in the black community that he would have hoped for. We’re doing very well with seniors and that’s good because they vote in large numbers.

We’ve had some recent polling numbers. We know Dan has done some polling and we suspect he knows that this is a close race. But look, I’m the underdog because there is a two and half to one registration disadvantage Democrat to Republican. Dan Onorato is an unknown. He doesn’t have the experience and that is something we will emphasize in our campaign. He has high name recognition but the public doesn’t know anything about him. I have the disadvantage because I have a record he can criticize. But I think the record is good and if people are objective and look at it in light of the fiscal crisis at the city and state level they will really appreciate the fact that the county has been cautious and conservative and we’re in good shape.

Insider: When do you think the air part of this campaign will get under way?

Roddey: Everyone wants to wait until the other guy does it but my guess is that by late August you’ll see commercials up. I’ve been going door to door, primarily on the weekends in Democratic areas. And it’s going to be a tight, close race.

The last time when I ran against Cyril Wecht (Allegheny County coroner and well-known forensic expert), he was a very good candidate in many respects. But he tended to polarize people with folks liking him a lot or not at all. With Dan, he’s an unknown. People may know the name but if he walked down the street people would not be able to pick him out.

One of the jobs we’ll have in this campaign is to help Dan define himself to the public (with a chuckle).

Insider: What are the challenges in the next four years for the county executive?

Roddey: They will remain the same. No 1 is economic development. We’ve done well. By the end of the year, we should be at 20,000 new jobs created. But we have to do better, at least 50 percent greater than what we have done. Secondly, fixing everything with the (property tax) assessments. We need to get all the bugs out and have a system that people don’t complain about. Third, we have to keep our eye on the ball with fiscal stability that we don’t overspend, that we continue to try to make government less costly and more efficient. Finally, we have challenges in specific areas: the jail which is full and we need to drive that population down; there is the U.S. Airways challenge and then we have the row office reform effort, which will produce significant savings and improve efficiency.


Go back to Insider Info


Dan Onorato
The Insider talks with the Democrat challenger.

An accountant and a lawyer by training, Dan Onorato, a native of Pittsburgh’s North Side, ran for his first elective office in 1991 when he was just barely 30 years old. He had just gotten a law degree from Pitt two years earlier after spending a number of years as an auditor with an accounting firm after graduating from Penn State in 1983.

Onorato’s first campaign was largely home grown, composed primarily of friends and family, since the party machine was backing the incumbent in the Democratic primary. After that first victory, Onorato went on to serve eight years on Pittsburgh’s city council, including a stint as council’s finance chairman, its second most powerful post.

In 1999, Onorato gave up his council seat to run for his present office, Allegheny County controller, where he is the chief fiscal watchdog of county government. Onorato said that during his three years in that office he led programs and initiatives that have helped county government operate more efficiently and that have saved the taxpayers millions of dollars.

  Dan Onorato

He is also a board member of the National Aviary and is a former board member of the Pittsburgh Children’s Museum as well as secretary of the Allegheny County Retirement Board, a post he holds by virtue of being county controller. Onorato still lives in Pittsburgh’s North Side with his wife, Shelly, and their three children: Kate, Emily and Danny.

Insider: Tell us a little about your career so far.

Onorato: I was born and raised in the North Side of Pittsburgh where I still live. I went to Penn State where I obtained an accounting degree and then I spent a few years practicing before I went to Pitt for my law degree. I was a lawyer for a few years and then I decided to seek the city council seat for the North Side and I challenged an incumbent, running against the endorsement and the machine. So it was a political upset. I spent two terms, eight years on city council. And I decided not to seek a third term but to run for county controller instead in 1999. And now I’m at that critical crossroads again where I’ve decided not to seek re-election so it’s up or out this November. I’m not doing it because I’m trying to hold on to a political office. I’m trying to move this county forward.

Insider: What are the one or two accomplishments as controller that you are most proud of?

Onorato: First of the computer system, which had not been upgraded in any major way for 22 years. We took 10 systems and merged them into one, which will be very helpful in streamlining government. Secondly, the audits that we’ve done have saved the county millions of dollars. Plus, I’ve audited every single row officer, all of them fellow Democrats; because I wanted to show that I was definitely non-partisan.

Insider: What do you view as the challenges for the next four years for the Allegheny County executive?

Onorato: The issues are very straight-forward. No 1, we still have a property tax system that is broken. We have to fix that. We have to cut government, to be able to cut property taxes. And the third thing is economic development. So fixing the property tax system and growing the economy at the same time. The way to do that is to grow the economy and spread the tax base to allow for a reduction. We have 10,000 acres ready for development at the new airport. We should invest in the infrastructure to allow that development to happen. And we can do that through the right kind of public-private partnerships.

Insider: Tell us a little bit about the political team that you’ve put together for this race.

Onorato: On my local team I have Joe Viebeck who has been with me for all of my races. I find him to be the best grass-roots, street-knowledgeable person in politics in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. I have a gentleman who is in charge of my field operations by the name of Marty Marks. Marty came back to Pittsburgh about a year ago with his wife who works for the Carnegie Science Center doing public relations. He has experience running the field operation for Mayor Richard Daley of Chicago and U.S. Sen. Richard Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois.

For my media, I decided to get Neil Oxman of Philadelphia for two reasons. First, Neil has a great relationship with the governor and the governor is supporting me 100 percent and secondly, Neil has already gone against the team that Roddey hired. He has experience dealing with Kent Gates, the campaign manager, and Brabender Cox, Jim’s media guy, because they were the consultants for the Mike Fisher campaign when Neil did Ed Rendell for governor. And we also brought on Dan Fee who successfully did the communications for the Rendell campaign and will coordinate the day-to-day media in this campaign. And Dan Petz is handling the polling. If you combine Neil and the two Dans with the local team I think we have a very strong campaign organization.

Insider: I presume the polling you’ve done this far is encouraging to you?

Onorato: Yes: The polling is very optimistic and it’s one of the factors that’s enabled me to match Jim Roddey dollar for dollar in fund-raising.

Insider: What is the status of your campaign finances?

Onorato: I’ve raised approximately $1.6 million going into August and Jim about $1.7 million. We both have about $1.3 million in the bank for this race so far. My budget, my goal has always been $2.5 million and that is still my budget and we will definitely hit that. Jim probably has the same budget. This race is not going to be won or lost on who has more money.

Insider: You mentioned your relationship with Gov. Rendell but you also have a relationship with John Estey his chief of staff.

Onorato: Yes, we went to law school together. He even visited Pittsburgh and worked on my very first campaign for council. He was part of my kitchen cabinet. We were all very young then, 29, 30 years old.

Insider: One of Jim Roddey’s points is that he is a "full time" executive and that you’ve always had some outside employment while you’ve held office in city council or as controller. Explain that to us?

Onorato: More misinformation on his part. I’ve been "of counsel" to some law firm ever since I was elected to council. I will tell you that it’s not much. In 2002, I made $14,000 maybe, from doing things for people in my neighborhood at nights and on Saturdays. I am definetly a full-time controller and public servant.

If Jim wants to make that an issue, I will challenge him. I will show him what "of counsel" means and produce the activity that took place that earned $14,000 while I was controller and I would hope that he would open up the records to the blind trust in which he put his business interests when he became executive. In 1999, when he was running for county executive, he made $900,000 in the private sector, according to his tax returns. I’ll compare my $14,000 to his $900,000 any day of the week!

Insider: He also has been trying to tag you with the city of Pittsburgh’s financial problems.

Onorato: First of all, I’ve been off council for four years. I was finance chair in 1994 and 1995, nine years ago. We had balanced budgets. We privatized the zoo, the aviary and Phipps Conservatory. I also sponsored and had passed a cut in the city business privilege taxes. I sponsored the senior citizens’ tax rebate. I’ve been a very strong fiscal conservative.

What Jim doesn’t want to tell you is that he’s the one with a much longer history of involvement with city government. He has been part of the last three administrations in the county and the city over the past 20 years. He was appointed chairman of a water and sewer authority where he consistently raised rates. He was then appointed by the county commissioners to be chairman of the (Pittsburgh region mass transit agency) Port Authority where he consistently raised fares. He was chairman of Alcosan (the Allegheny County Sanitary Authority or sewage system) where he consistently raised rates. And now he is the head of county government where he’s imposed a $32 million tax increase. Anyone can balance budgets if you raise rates or taxes and that is his track record. He was part of all those administrations.

Insider: What would be your biggest criticism of the Roddey administration?

Onorato: There are two things and they are equally troubling. Jim Roddey embraced the property reassessment in Allegheny County and it ended up being a $32 million windfall. He did not take seriously cutting government and that has really hurt. Jim triggered a tax increase for the school districts, for the municipalities and the county because they are all based on these numbers. And as a result, according to an article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, we have had the largest number of foreclosures in Allegheny County since 1969, even worse than the collapse of the steel industry in the early 1980s. He’s taxing people out of their homes! I’m making that connection.

He was elected four years ago and told the people, "I’m a businessman. I’ll use my contacts to grow this region." But instead it’s been four years of missed opportunities. I can’t point to one economic development that he started or finished or completed in the last four years. Nothing has happened. Everywhere I go people, both Republicans and Democrats, tell me they are disappointed with him. Nothing has happened that they thought would happen.


Go back to Insider Info


The Republican Race for State Attorney General
Three qualified and aggressive candidates are looking to succeed the incumbent Mike Fisher, who is term-limited in the job

It’s a battle that is being fought below the surface for the moment. It takes the form of letters, newsletters and personal visits to local Republican officials and Republican State Committee members. It’s fund raising and building coalitions -- and looking over your shoulder at two equally aggressive rivals.

Welcome to the race for the Republican nomination for attorney general, which may just be coming into view for the casual observer of state politics but which has for those involved already has become intense if static for the moment.

Static because it’s unlikely that any of the three GOP hopefuls will pull out before Republican State Committee meets in January and selects its endorsed candidate for next April’s primary. Pennsylvanians have only elected three attorney generals since the office was made elective in 1980 and all have been Republicans, making the action on the GOP side of the fence quite intense for the job of chief law enforcement officer.

In fact, some Republican observers say the political activity swirling around the 2004 race for attorney general is the most competitive they have seen in the party since 1994 when there was an open governor’s seat and five Republicans competed. That year Tom Ridge, an Erie congressman, won the coveted party endorsement, narrowly won a five-way primary for governor and then went on to win in November.

What remains unclear right now is what will happen after January when presumably the state party endorses one of the The Republican race for state attorney general is intense with three qualified and aggressive candidates looking to succeed the incumbent Mike Fisher, who is term-limited in the job three hopefuls. Will the other two contenders drop out, as has been the custom in the party? The issue remains to be settled.

The three hopefuls come from three corners of the state -- Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Scranton (with a secondary base in Harrisburg). So it is a Bermuda Triangle of a competition.

Here are the contenders in alphabetical order:

  • Bruce Castor,now finishing his first term as district attorney in Montgomery County where he is on the ballot for re-election and is expected to win handily in November. Castor has been raising money under his "Friends of Bruce Castor" campaign account for back-to-back campaigns -- reelection as DA and then a run for the Republican nod for attorney general. He has never hidden that fact.

  • Tom Corbett of suburban Pittsburgh best known as the former U.S. attorney in the Western District of Pennsylvania during the first Bush administration. He also served as state attorney general by appointment from Gov. Tom Ridge for 15 months in late 1995 and 1996 after Ernie Preate plead guilty to mail fraud and had to resign.

  • Joe Peters,a former top official in the state attorney general’s office who oversaw drugs and organized crime operations. He has worked as a federal prosecutor in Washington, Philadelphia and Harrisburg and is the son of former Scranton Mayor Gene Peters. He was part of a team of prosecutors who brought down Philadelphia mob boss Nicky Scarfo 15 years ago.

All three men believe they have a strong stake on the job. Each has a campaign apparatus in place. Each believes they can win the party endorsement and keep the office in Republican hands.

That may be no easy task because a slew of Democrats has their sights set on that job as well. As this issue was going to press, Allegheny County District Attorney Steve Zappala, who had previously said he was exclusively focused on re-election, said he is now considering seeking the Democratic nomination after being approached about the job by Gov. Ed Rendell at a recent political event in Pittsburgh.

Other candidates considering a run include Jim Eisenhower, the party’s 2000 nominee for that job, a close Rendell supporter and chairman of the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency; former U.S. Attorney David Barasch of Harrisburg and two local district attorneys, John Morganelli of Northampton County and Matt Mangino of Lawrence County.

But for now the three Republican contenders are focused on getting the edge on each other.

Corbett proclaims that he had the job for 15 months by gubernatorial appointment so he has "a head start" and can hit the ground running. He also chaired the commission on crime and delinquency for Govs. Ridge and Schweiker for eight years. After leaving Harrisburg in 1997, he returned to a large Pittsburgh law firm, then became general counsel for a waste management company. He now practices some law while spending most of his days campaigning.

Peters, who began his career as a street cop in his hometown of Scranton, said he has drawn on that experience in his dealings with people throughout his career in law enforcement. "I’ve always worked in law enforcement and I want to continue that regardless of my candidacy," said Peters, who is also a consultant on law enforcement issues while he runs for attorney general.

Castor is best known in his home region as a flamboyant homicide prosecutor who has personally handled a number of headline cases. He began his career as an intern in the Montgomery County district attorney’s office in 1985 and rose to first assistant in 1993. He was elected DA in 1999 and is up for re-election on the November ballot.

Castor sees his local notoriety and his electoral experience as his advantages on his two foes. "I know positions that they (Corbett and Peters) have held but I don’t know exactly what they did there. With me, all you have to do is type my name into (an Internet) search engine and 3,000 newspaper articles show up with things I did," Castor said.

The Insider has interviewed all three Republican hopefuls and plans to run the full text of the interviews in our first issue in October.


Go back to Insider Info


Political Updates
National Democrats see Pennsylvania as not their best target for Congress

Sources at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee list their top priorities in Pennsylvania in this order:

  • Filling the seat of outgoing Democratic congressman Joe Hoeffel’s seat with a Democrat.

  • Defending Tim Holden’s seat in a Republican-dominated district in central Pennsylvania.

  • Funding a decent contender in the Lehigh Valley where the Republican nominee is expected to be state Sen. Charlie Dent, a popular vote-getter. The Democrats are currently eyeing two Common Please judges, Jack Panella or Tom Wallitsch, or someone better-known

  • Funding Murray Levin is he makes a run against first-term Congressman Jim Gerlach.

  • Funding a candidate against freshman Congressman Tim Murphy of Allegheny County. The top contenders are Allegheny Clerk of Courts George Matta and former 2002 candidate Jack Machek who gave Murphy a decent race in 2002.

But Pennsylvania Democrats know they will have a tough time getting the national House Democratic Campaign Committee to fund races here.

It’s all a numbers game to the DCCC. As long as Pennsylvania keeps losing seats in Congress due to just modest population gain compared to other states, it makes little sense for national Democrats to fight for seats here that might be gobbled up in the next redistricting -- especially when redistricting is controlled by Pennsylvania’s GOP-dominated state Legislature.

That makes winning a seat in Pennsylvania a lower priority than winning one in states with population gains like Texas, Arizona and California.

"If you win a seat in Pennsylvania, you can lose it 8 years later to reapportionment," one top DCCC strategist said. "If you win a seat in a state with population growth, you can only lose it at an election. And that’s a better state to invest our resources in."

Democrat Max Baer talks about "constituent service" from the court system in his bid for a seat on the state Supreme Court

Pundits are impressed with Judge Max Baer's new "constituent service" campaign, but wonder if even that tried-and-trued voter-pleaser will work in a judicial election.

About 50 years ago, with the move to increase federal congressional staffs, congressmen began to get elected not because of how they voted, but because they helped their voters deal with the ever more complicated bureaucracy of the federal government.

Nowadays, modern members of Congress have between four and 10 staff members whose sole job is to help voters with their problems with Social Security, Medicare, immigration, passports and other matters.

Other levels of government, including city councils and state assemblies have also increased staffs and offer "constituent services" in district offices. Most political analysts believe the growing emphasis on constituent services along with the sheer expense of running for elective office are the prime reasons incumbents rarely lose re-election.

So now Baer, who won accolades for his work in reforming Allegheny County’s Family Court division during the 1990s, is trying to apply this principle to his Supreme Court race against fellow jurist, Republican Joan Orie Melvin who now sits on the Superior Court.

While most people deal with the federal and local governments on a regular basis (getting a passport, resolving their parent's Social Security hassles, putting their parents into a nursing home, etc.) few deal with the court system.

And even fewer know that when it comes to making the rules for courts and lawyers, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court earns that word, "Supreme." Unlike the federal courts, state Supreme Court regulations trump those of the Legislature. The only way for the Legislature to override a court decision is the cumbersome process of amending the state constitution.

Baer wants to use those broad powers of the high court to make it more "user friendly." Baer is promising to push for more night and weekend sessions for family court and other courts which compel the attendance of those who must work for a living and for whom taking off time to attend court sessions is a hardship.

Baer is also promising to work to make the court system pay for DNA testing in any applicable case. Those are promises that most people would welcome, because they would make the court more citizen-friendly. But they are expensive and would not only require more state money, but conceivably could dump unfunded mandates on the counties.

Melvin, who is more cautious in that regard, is promising only to think about Baer's proposals. Publicly, she only favors court-paid DNA testing in death penalty murder cases.

But privately, she is telling supporters she would use the court's rule-making powers to enact tort reforms, lawsuit limits and perhaps to pay attorney contingency fees.

The practical effect of this is that if Baer is elected, he will try to let it be seen as not only a mandate for his specific proposals but, in general, for the more sweeping use of the high court’s judicial rule-making power.

Bob Asher proves his prowess as a fund-raiser again

Republican National Committeeman Bob Asher showed again this past month why he is one of the state's premier fund-raisers. On Sept. 25, his Pennsylvania Future Fund raised $120,000 for Supreme Court GOP nominee Joan Orie Melvin, $135,000 for Sam Katz, the Republican candidate for mayor of Philadelphia and $25,000 each for the state House and state Senate GOP campaign committees.

That is $300,000 in one night, a feat matched only by the likes of Ed Rendell, Tom Ridge and Arlen Specter, fund raising champions all.

Those funds for Katz come after Asher had already played a key role in successful fund-raisers for President Bush which met the president's Pennsylvania goals.

And in the case of Katz, it shows just how deep the Republican Party runs in Asher's veins. Katz, as many will remember, ran against Tom Ridge in the 1994 primary for governor. One of Katz’s ads specifically pilloried Ridge for having the support of Asher, who served about a year in prison after this conviction in the 1980s in the complicated CTA bribery scandal. The CTA case also took down state Treasurer R. Budd Dwyer who publicly committed suicide rather than accept his fate of a jail term.

But as little as five years after that slight from the Katz campaign, Asher was raising money for Katz in his 1999 unsuccessful bid for mayor when he narrowly lost to Democrat John Street. And Asher has remained a major fund-raiser for Katz all along.

Pennsylvania Women’s Coalition Fund honors one of its own while raising funds toward its goal of electing more women to the Legislature.

On Sept. 23, the Pennsylvania Women’s Coalition Fund honored Nancy Newman, its former president and one of the founders of the bipartisan fund which supports progressive women candidates running for the state Legislature, regardless of party affiliation.

The event in Harrisburg raised more than $10,000. Newman of Lewisburg is the author of a number of books about women and politics and is a former national president of the League of Women’s Voters and she also chaired the national campaign to pass the Equal Rights Amendment. Newman was presented with the Seneca award named for Seneca Falls, NY, the location of the first women’s rights convention in the United States.

National group targets Specter as a RINO (Republican in Name Only)

The Arlen Specter-Pat Toomey primary earned a half-page article in the Time Magazine late this month. The contest was highlighted as one of the intra-party races in which the conservative Club for Growth will invest toward its long-term goal of defeating a major RINO and Specter definitely is in the group’s sight hairs. The club has sent Toomey $350,000 toward what it hopes to be a $1 million package to help him unseat Specter. The moderate-leaning Republican Main Street Partnership intends to raise $1 million for Specter to neutralize the Club for Growth’s efforts for Toomey.

Bruce Castor files $400,000 campaign cash balance for late September

Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor is up for re-election but really has his eye on next year’s prize of the Republican nomination for state attorney general. Castor cites fund-raising as one of his strengths in the intra-party contest with former appointed state attorney general Tom Corbett and former state and federal prosecutor Joe Peters. Castor’s campaign reported late last month that he had $400,000 cash on hand. It’s unlikely Castor will spend any of that on his easy re-election, instead hoarding it for the battle for the state GOP endorsement in January or the primary in April.


Go back to Insider Info